Reading this book ended up being a somewhat mixed experience. I read the book twice, once in February or so and once last week. I don’t really know why I picked it up again, I guess somehow “I wasn’t done with the book” yet. This is probably also why I didn’t manage to write a review after the first time. I started writing a review, but never finished it. This review you are reading now, uses parts of the original, half-finished one, but they have all been rewritten and added to.
When I finished the book the first time, I somehow couldn’t get to grips with it. I finished it at the time, but I also felt that maybe it just wasn’t the right time to read it. You know, how sometimes you are not enjoying a book, but you feel that you would probably like it better if you read it at some other time when your mood is different or you have less other things on your mind? That’s how I felt when I first read Reading Lolita. I think it had something to do with not having time to read in larger sittings. For most of the book I only had time for a few pages at a time. I thoroughly enjoyed the few parts I managed to read in one larger sitting.
For me the weakest part of the book was the first part, both times I read the book. The first time I started the book, I read the first part (about 80 pages in my edition) in short stretches, a chapter at a time. This obviously didn’t work, because I didn’t get into the story. Even the second time around, being already familiar with the story, for me the first chapter was the weakest part of the book, it was too much all over the place. Only when I read a larger part in one sitting, did I like the book. For example, the first time I read the book I read the second part in one sitting and loved it. This second part ended up being my favorite part of the book, both times around.
As you can probably already guess, I am not one of those people who is gushing over Reading Lolita in Tehran. In fact, I have mixed feelings about the book. That is why this review might come across as a bit unstructured. I enjoyed the book, the first time probably more so than the second, but more on a rational level than an emotional level. If that makes sense. Rationally, I can definitely agree with all the praise that this is indeed a good book, one that gives a very good picture of life in contemporary Iran. I very much liked Nafisi’s way with words, especially in portraying a person or showing a situation. Also, in the writing I could feel that Nafisi cares about the people she writes about. I actually enjoyed reading the book, more so the first time than the second time around.
Reading Lolita in Tehran is divided into four parts, each part centered around an author and one or a few of his/her works, Vladimir Nabokov, F. Scott Fitzgerald (The Great Gatsby), Henry James, and Jane Austen. I haven’t read any of the books and authors that form the core of the book, except for some of Jane Austen’s work, but not being familiar with them didn’t really hinder me. Though I think it does add to the experience of Reading Lolita in Tehran if you are familiar with the authors and books discussed. And it does make me for one more inclined to pick up works from the authors discussed when I will come across them.
Each part of the book also covers a central theme or period in Azar Nafisi’s own life branching out to cover the stories of the seven female students that Nafisi chooses for a special literature class she teaches every Thursday at her house. One of my problems with the book is that I had a problem keeping most of the girls in the reading class and their histories separate. Somehow they blended into each other in a way, even though their stories and backgrounds were very different. The one that stood out most and became the most individual to me, was Yassi.
Something that started to bug me the second time around, was the question: “If this is a memoir, then how much of it is true and how much of it is made up?” The Author’s Note at the beginning of the book says:
Aspects of characters and events in this story have been changed mainly to protect individuals, not just from the eye of the censor but also from those who read such narratives to discover who’s who and who did what to whom[...]. The facts in this story are true insofar as any memory is ever truthful, but I have made every effort to protect friends and students, baptizing them with new names and disguising them perhaps even from themselves, changing and interchanging facts of their lives so that their secrets are safe.
I am perfectly okay with changing things to keep people’s identities safe, no problem with that at all. The phrase that bothers me more, is “The facts in this story are true insofar as any memory is ever truthful”, especially because in the story Nafisi mentions several times that her memory is not that great, implying there may be things she doesn’t remember correctly. After coming across similar remarks a few times, I started thinking to what extent this is still a memoir and to what extent is it no longer. And if not, what is it then? Fiction? Semi-fiction? (Did I just invent a new word and genre?) How much of the book is based on real events and how do we know that? Don’t get me wrong, I do not intend to discredit Nafisi or the book. It just got me thinking.
I think that a review written after the first time I read the book, would have been a lot more enthusiastic about Reading Lolita than the one you are reading now. I think that the first time around, despite my difficulties keeping the characters apart, I felt more strongly about the people in the book. Maybe, I shouldn’t have read the book a second time, I don’t know.
Still, despite this less than glowing review and the questions the book raised with me, I do recommend Reading Lolita in Tehran. I think the problems I have with it are more connected to me than to the book itself. It is a good book, well written, informative, giving a good picture of life in Iran (or at least of the intelligentsia in Tehran), though it needs time to get going. I have the feeling that it is also one of those books you need to take time for, it is best read in larger sessions I think (Sunday afternoons on the porch maybe or rainy days). For me, it is not one of those books you take with you to read in a few stolen minutes while waiting somewhere.
Other reviews of Reading Lolita in Tehran:
An adventure in reading
Trish’s Reading Nook
Age 30 – A Year in books
If you have reviewed Reading Lolita in Tehran as well, leave a comment with the link to your review, or send me an email with the link. I will add it to this post
In Europa - Geert Mak
Kindertijd Jeugdjaren Jongelingschap (Childhood Boyhood Youth) - Lev Tolstoy
I read this book a few years ago and had a very similar reaction. I liked the idea of the book, but the execution was not that great. I also had a hard time telling the girls apart. And I did feel somewhat hindered by not having read ANY of the books they discussed.
Still, as you say, it gave a vivid & poignant picture of these women’s lives in Iran.
Thanks for your review. I agree, the girls seems to blur together to me, but it didn’t take away from the story in my opinion … I saw the girls as sort of one unit, if you know what I mean. Here’s a link to my review if you like to post it – I’m linking it up to yours now.
Heather, I added the link to your review. Now I am off to actually read it!
Julie, I am glad I am not the only one to have these problems with the book. It is funny, because I keep wanting to stress that I did actually enjoy the book!
I just read Heather’s review and I wrote something in a comment to her review that I feel like posting here as well. In her review Heather mentions that Reading Lolita encouraged her to read more critically. Here is part of my comment to her review:
I am not sure if Reading Lolita will make me read more critically, but it did confirm something I have been thinking about recently. Since I started blogging about books last year and trying to put into words what I like and don’t like about the books I read, I realized that I would love to have more tools to my disposal to judge and write about a book. I would love to be able to get more out of a book by having a better understanding of things like plot and character development, stylistics, etc. Maybe I should look into online courses on literature or something like that?
Thanks for checking out my review. You might want to look into the online courses offered by LitLovers. I’ve never tried one, but it seems to be exactly what you’re looking for. Please let me know if you take one of the courses … maybe you could guest blog about it over at my site?!
I’ve never heard of Litlovers, but I will go and check it out right now! Will let you know the result. Thanks a lot for the lead, Heather!
I had mixed feelings about this one as well–and it took me three tries to actually finish it. I liked the first chapter a lot (maybe because I read it three times!) and then the last chapter but the middle for me felt weak. I think one of the things about this book is that it lacked cohesiveness? Longer stretches of time to read definitely helps–but the chapters, if I remember correctly, are quite long! I’ll be reading Lolita in a few months, so I’ll be interested in seeing the comparisons Nafisi discussed.
It’s funny, Trish, because I had exactly the opposite: I liked the middle parts the best and the first chapter was the weakest. One of the reasons I liked the middle parts the best was exactly because for me they were more cohesive than especially the first part.
The book is divided in four parts each dedicated to an author. These parts were something like 80-100 pages each. The parts were divided in chapters, though, which were of normal size, ranging from half a page or so till ten-fifteen pages max.
I am glad I am not the only one with mixed feelings about the book!
I bought this book not to long ago secondhand and every time I’m in the store I pick it up to look at it and then tell myself, wait, I own this book! I honestly don’t know if I’ll get to it this year but your review does make me curious about it.