Echte mannen eten geen kaas has been a bestseller and its author Maria Mosterd a bit of a media hype in Holland since the book was published a year and a half ago and I think it deserves the attention, because it is an urgent and important book, though it does raises some important questions. I finished the book over two weeks ago, but I am still thinking about it and I will for some time to come.
The book’s author Maria Mosterd is now barely twenty years old, but she has already lived a lifetime worth of experiences. From age twelve till age sixteen she was in the hands of a loverboy, a guy called Manou, who forced her into prostitution and turned her life into one of crime, sex, drugs and violence. I am not sure the term loverboy is used in the same way outside of Holland. In Dutch the English word has come to refer to guys who start a relationship with young women and then force them into prostitution and crime. Over the last couple of years, the problem of loverboys has come to the foreground in Holland. Quite a few cases have been discussed in Dutch media in the past years.
Echte mannen eten geen kaas (literally translates as: Real men don’t eat cheese – a quote from Manou) recounts these four years Mosterd spent with Manou and how she eventually broke free from that life. It also describes how Mosterd became mentally so dependent on Manou, on someone telling her when to do what, even when to go to the bathroom. Some of the most poignant parts of the book are when she talks about the physical and mental control Manou has over her, the double feelings of love and hate she has for him and how hard it is for her to break free from him, especially mentally.
The book is written in a very conversational style and uses quite a lot of current slang and curse words. I needed a few pages to get used to that and quite honestly it made me feel “old”. Once I got used to the writing style, I raced through the book, reading especially the first part with a continuous knot in my stomach. The book is written in a very straightforward way and the slang, curse words, sex and violence may not be to everyone’s liking, but I feel they are necessary in this book, they are not superfluous. They are part of the culture, the world Mosterd lives in and they reflect her age and her character. The fairly simple and conversational writing style also make this book accessible to teenage girls. I feel this is a book that should be read widely by teenagers (and their parents) as a warning.
The book raised many questions, things I didn’t “get”, things I am still thinking about. So please keep in mind that especially the following part of this review are “thoughts under construction”. I find that the more distance (in time) I take from the book, the more I see its shortcomings.
There is one small scene at the beginning of the book that is not very relevant to the bigger story, but for some reason I keep thinking about it. Mosterd describes how, as 11-12 year olds (before she meets Manou), she and her friend would walk through their town’s shopping streets handing out notes with their mobile phone numbers to cute guys. They would then wait for them to call and set up a meeting. Of course the girls wouldn’t show up, but instead hide somewhere nearby to watch the guys wait for them. We are talking 11 and 12 year olds here, handing out phone numbers to random strangers on the street!! I could not wrap my head around this. At all. When I was that age something like that would not even enter my head. Okay, I admit, I was twelve in the pre-mobile phone age and I was raised in very different circumstances.
Mosterd’s life with Manou went on undetected for four years, which made me think why didn’t the school or especially the mother (Mosterd comes from a single-parent family) notice anything, take any action? In between the lines you can actually read that both at school and the mother noticed things were not going well with Maria, but it is as if everywhere people consciously looked the other way, trying not to see or to deny that something was going on. Mosterd would come home stoned from smoking marijuana (Man, are my search ratings going to soar because of this post: sex, violence, drugs…), she hardly attended school during those four years, but no one asked questions or, if anyone did, no one pushed further to find out more. I do realize that my knowledge is obviously limited to what I read in the book and in a few interviews, so it is very hard to judge the situation or put blame on anyone because obviously there is more I do not know than I do know.
The impression I got from Mosterd’s story is that she didn’t have many positive male role models in her life and that this may have played a part. There are hints in the book that she had “bad” boyfriends before and she comes from a single-parent family and hardly has any contact with her dad. I am definitely not saying that all this happened because she comes from a single-parent family. I don’t believe single-parent or other non-traditional families are necessarily a worse surrounding for children to grow up in. Traditional families can screw up just as well and there are many single parents or parents in non-traditional families who do a great job in raising their children. From reading the book, I just got the impression that in this particular case lack of positive male role models may have played a part in making her vulnerable.
It is too easy to just lay the blame with the school or Mosterd’s mother, because things like this (and Mosterd is not the only girl in Holland to fall prey to a loverboy) can only happen in a society or in a (sub)culture that permits situations like that. I am most definitely not blaming Dutch society as a whole, because forced prostitution, crime etc. are most certainly not accepted by society as a whole, but there are definitely sections or subcultures in Dutch society (and in many others), that make things like this possible. Unfortunately, from reading the book one might get the impression that things like this only happen among the Suriname, Netherlands-Antilles and other ethnic minorities in Holland and not among “white” ethnically Dutch. This sure is not the case. This is not an issue confined to ethnic minorities, but ethnically Dutch girls can just as easily become a victim and my guess is that there are ethnically Dutch men posing as loverboys just as well.
Earlier this year, Mosterd’s mother sued the school for negligence, for failure to react to Mosterd’s frequent absences from school. Which is kind of funny, because despite the frequent absences, Mosterd always got passing grades on her report cards and she always seemed to have progressed to the next year and never seemed to have to repeat a year (possible in Dutch schools if you don’t get enough passing grades). Also, it gives me the impression she is turning the majority of the responsibility of raising a child over to the school. I honestly don’t know if she would have gone to court had it not been for the book and the publicity it got. Apparently Lucie Mosterd, Maria’s mother, has now published a book as well about her side of the story. Why is mama Mosterd trying so hard to get money from the school, but from what I read doesn’t make more of an effort to get Manou behind bars? Is it just me, or is mama Mosterd really “milking” her daughter’s new found fame?
Some of the critics of the book raised some completely different but equally legitimate questions: Why have the police or the public prosecutor never decided to investigate Manou? Dutch criminal law is not my legal specialty, but from what I know, if the police or the public prosecutor have enough evidence or a large enough suspicion that criminal facts have been committed, they can launch an investigation even if there is no victim or nothing has been reported to the police. Other major criticisms are that there are points when Mosterd’s story rambles and critics wonder about Manou who appears to have completely disappeared from the face of the earth. Two pieces critical about Maria Mosterd’s story can be found here and here (both in Dutch). I may not agree with everything said on those two sites, but they do raise legitimate questions.
Despite the many questions the book raises, Echte mannen eten geen kaas is an important book. It vividly describes part of the “underbelly” of Holland, something that most people don’t know much about and (fortunately) will never experience, but it also describes problems that we cannot keep silent about, that have to be discussed and solved. It is a book that (unless proven otherwise) needs to be widely read.
A review of Mosterd’s newly released second book, Bindi, continuing where Echte mannen eten geen kaas left off and which was published just a few weeks ago can be found here (link in Dutch).